Alvaro Herrera escribió:
> The only thing I'm now missing is SnapshotResetXmin(). It currently
> looks like this:
> After the patch we don't have any way to detect whether resowner.c has
> any snapshot still linked to. I assume there's no objection to adding a
> new entry point in resowner.c for this.
Hmm, that doesn't readily work because there's no way to track
transaction boundaries in resource owners. I think I'll have to add a
separate static counter in snapmgr.c that's maintained by the calls from
resowner.c.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
