Tom Lane wrote:
> If you are willing to run a hand-hacked version then I'd suggest doing
> your experimentation with CVS HEAD. There are changes in place already
> to reduce the stats file traffic.
Why do we _have_ to write the file to disk? I wonder if it would work
to store the file in a mmaped memory region and have the readers get
data from there. We could have more than one copy, reference-counted so
that they can be removed when the old readers are gone.
Are MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS mmapped regions portable? Linux claims
to support them from 2.4.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
