Re: Bad performance on simple query - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alan Hodgson
Subject Re: Bad performance on simple query
Date
Msg-id 200811170828.51424@hal.medialogik.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bad performance on simple query  (Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Monday 17 November 2008, Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com> wrote:
>> It takes 0.091s (!):
> perpedes_db=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM triphistory WHERE ownerId =
> 10015 ORDER BY accessTS DESC LIMIT 5; QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------- Limit  (cost=0.00..7.99 rows=5 width=106) (actual
> time=0.024..0.042 rows=5 loops=1) ->  Index Scan Backward using
> idx_trip_history_owner_access_ts on triphistory  (cost=0.00..142.20
> rows=89 width=106) (actual time=0.021..0.034 rows=5 loops=1) Index Cond:
> (ownerid = 10015)
>  Total runtime: 0.091 ms

That's 0.091 milliseconds (0.000091 seconds).


--
Corporations will ingest natural resources and defecate garbage until all
resources are depleted, debt can no longer be repaid and our money becomes
worthless - Jay Hanson

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dimi Paun
Date:
Subject: Bad performance on simple query
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad performance on simple query