Il Wednesday 15 October 2008 17:55:03 Tom Lane ha scritto:
> "Richard Broersma" <richard.broersma@gmail.com> writes:
> > For this reason, clients passing natural joins to the server can have
> > dangerous result sets returned with no warning.
>
> Yeah. A lot of people consider that NATURAL JOIN is simply a bad idea
> and shouldn't be used ever --- it's too easy to shoot yourself in the
> foot with a careless column addition or rename. Explicitly spelling out
> the join columns with ON or USING is a lot less prone to silent breakage
> after a schema change.
>
> regards, tom lane
Both are perfectly right, indeed.
Nonetheless, in my opinion a NATURAL JOIN exploiting the FKs
instead of the column names would be much more helpful and much less error
prone!
As far as I know there is no way to exploit FKs in JOINs, right?
THANKS
