All,
I was discussing WITH RECURSIVE the other day, and realized that one thing
which we're not getting with this patch is a simplest-case simple syntax
which 75% of users are looking for. You know, the ones with simple
proximity trees who just want to find all children of one parent.
Would it be a worth it for us to implement a non-standard simple syntax
sugar on top of WITH RECURSIVE? Or, at least, something like
CONNECT_BY()?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco
