Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02
Date
Msg-id 200809071351.m87DpoS22291@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > As far as the page not fitting after conversion, what about some user
> > command that will convert an entire table to the new format if page
> > expansion fails.
> 
> VACUUM?
> 
> Having to run a manual command defeats the purpose somewhat, though. 
> Especially if you have no way of knowing on what tables it needs to be 
> run on.

My assumption is that the page not fitting would be a rare case so
requiring something like vacuum to fix it would be OK.

What I don't want to do it to add lots of complexity to the code just to
handle the page expansion case, when such a case is rare and perhaps can
be fixed by a vacuum.

> > I am ready to focus on these issues for 8.4;  all this needs to be
> > fleshed out, perhaps on a wiki.  As a starting point, what would be
> > really nice is to start a wiki that lists all data format changes for
> > every major release.
> 
> Have you looked at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/In-place_upgrade 
> already, that Greg Smith mentioned elsewhere in this thread? That's a 
> good starting point.

Agreed.

> In fact, I don't think there's any low-level data format changes yet 
> between 8.3 and 8.4, so this would be a comparatively easy release to 
> implement upgrade-in-place. There's just the catalog changes, but AFAICS 
> nothing that would require scanning through relations.

Yep.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Prototype: In-place upgrade v02
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Noisy CVS updates