Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Drake
Subject Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 20080819212710.75b200ff@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:10:35 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> > Another option would be to break up the conf like the above but do
> > not include any of them in the main postgresql.conf (which is how I
> > would argue it should be done). Thus if you want to modify logging,
> > you "include" it in the postgresql.conf but you make your
> > adjustments in logging.conf. 
> 
> The problem then is that they modify the logging.conf file and then
> wonder why the change doesn't take effect.

Well we have that problem already :)

Joshua D. Drake 


-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: age(xid) function bug
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make the pg_stat_activity view call a SRF