Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > To address Magnus' specific question, right now we store the pg_hba.conf
> > tokens as strings in the postmaster. I am fine with storing them in a
> > more native format and throwing errors for values that don't convert.
> > What would concern me is calling lots of 3rd party libraries from the
> > postmaster to validate items.
>
> If I was unclear about that, that part was never part of what I
> proposed. I'm only talking aobut parsing the syntax. The only external
> calls in the code there now is the getaddrinfo calls to convert the IPs,
> IIRC.
That seems safe to me. The use of strings for the pg_hba.conf content
was only for convenience; I can see the advantage of using a more
natural format.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
