On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 04:01:29PM -0400, Frank Bax wrote:
> You mentioned that the process of insert/delete is to be repeated. Are all
> the rows that were inserted; the same ones that will be deleted when the
> cycle is complete? If yes; then after you delete this batch of rows; add a
> 'junky' column and populate with any value different from the default.
> Your mass-insert should populate with the default value; and you can delete
> based on this value.
That would work, and might even be possible, but adding a column just
to mark test data doesn' quite sit right. This data is, yucch, tax
data, and I have been generating test cases with bogus country names,
like Fredonia -- the taxes themselves are in a dozen tables with
foreign key references holding them together, one of them being the
country name. I was sort of doing what you suggest by using bogus
country names, but that's only indirect. To add a column to every
concerned table would be a pain for other reasons.
-- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket
surgeon/ felix@crowfix.com GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
