Re: Avoiding Application Re-test - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Avoiding Application Re-test
Date
Msg-id 20080807142555.GB4171@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Avoiding Application Re-test  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:

> What I would like is a parameter called sql_compatibility which has
> settings such as 8.3, 8.4 etc.. By default it would have the value 8.4,
> but for people that want to upgrade *without* retesting their
> application, they could set it to 8.3.

I think down this route lies code readability and maintenability
madness.  Right now, the optimizer and executor code is already a very
complex beast.  We don't need to make it more difficult to understand
and improve.

Besides, the guys not updating their applications would not be
benefitted by the upgrade if they kept the compatibility with the older
version, so why would they upgrade?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Visibility Groups
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: For what should pg_stop_backup wait?