Re: Overhauling GUCS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date
Msg-id 200806061439.32335.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juni 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> How far could we get with the answers to just three questions:
>
> * How many concurrent queries do you expect to have?
>
> * How much RAM space are you willing to let Postgres use?
>
> * How much "overhead" disk space are you willing to let Postgres use?

This is surely a good start.  We could optimize this even more by saying, disk 
space is cheap, so let's just use a much higher default setting for 
checkpoint_segments.  (If PostgreSQL is installed but not actually used, not 
all the space is actually going to be used anyway.)  Then, increase 
max_connections a bit; that should be OK for most users.  Then you are left 
with the memory settings, and those need kernel tuning in most cases, so any 
automation tool loses.  Hmm.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Next
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS