On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 04:33:01PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Moreover, it seems unlikely that it will even cover the field. A partial
> cloak might indeed be worse than none, in that it will give some developers
> an illusion of having security.
I think this is a really important point, and one that isn't getting
enough attention in this discussion. Half a security measure is
almost always worse than none at all, exactly because people stop
thinking they have to worry about that area of security at all. I
think without a convincing argument that the proposal will even come
close to covering most SQL injection cases, it's a bad idea.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/
