Re: we don't have a bugzilla - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: we don't have a bugzilla
Date
Msg-id 20080427155801.GA5550@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: we don't have a bugzilla  (Shane Ambler <pgsql@Sheeky.Biz>)
Responses Re: we don't have a bugzilla  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Shane Ambler wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>> Maybe because there's a perfectly functional archive link in the mail
>> headers?  And because there's an RFC that tells us how such headers
>> are supposed to work?
>
> As a lot of people use gui apps, (I do seem to recall that mail cli  
> shows the full headers) most would never see the detailed headers of an  
> email. I know I very rarely look at the full source of an email.

So the proper thing to do is complain to the writer of the GUI app so
that it has an option for showing the list headers, perhaps adding a
menu entry when they are found.

CLI email clients do not typically show the full headers -- the user
must ask for them, just like a GUI app.  Most of the time I don't look
at the source of emails either.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Tom Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Update: < * Allow adding enumerated values to an existing
Next
From: Maurizio Oristanio
Date:
Subject: PQexecPrepared with cursor to fetch single results