Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)
Date
Msg-id 20080420114816.42f779ab@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:32:58 -0600
"Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:

> Exactly.  There are several things you can do on the replica that you
> wouldn't do on the master for better performance.  Really big numbers
> of WAL segments, no background writer, fsync off as mentioned, WAL on
> a RAID-0 with 10 disks, no battery back on a caching RAID controller,
> and so on.

You are still limited by how fast you can pull data from the master
over the network to the slave. Which when dealing with 500GB+ is a
significant limitation.

Joshua D. Drake


--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Wall
Date:
Subject: JDBC addBatch more efficient?
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: In the belly of the beast (MySQLCon)