Re: Background writer underemphasized ... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: Background writer underemphasized ...
Date
Msg-id 20080416160724.7605ffdb.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Background writer underemphasized ...  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-performance
In response to Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>:

> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Bill Moran wrote:
>
> >> bgwriter_delay = 10000ms         # 10-10000ms between rounds
> >> bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 1000     # 0-1000 max buffers written/round
> > Have you watched closely under load to ensure that you're not seeing a
> > huge performance hit every 10s when the bgwriter kicks off?
>
> bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 1000 means that any background writer pass can
> write at most 1000 pages = 8MB.  Those are buffered writes going into the
> OS cache, which it will write out at its own pace later.  That isn't going
> to cause a performance hit when it happens.
>
> That isn't the real mystery though--where's the RAID5 rant I was expecting
> from you?

Oh crap ... he _is_ using RAID-5!  I completely missed an opportunity to
rant!

blah blah blah ... RAID-5 == evile, etc ...

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Background writer underemphasized ...
Next
From: "Jeffrey Baker"
Date:
Subject: Anybody using the Dell Powervault MD3000 array?