Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Subject | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20080331195506.GK4999@tamriel.snowman.net Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel, Honestly, I havn't dug into the real patch all that deeply but I did notice a few minor issues which I've listed out below. The bigger question I have for this patch, however, is just how close is it to PL/pgSQL? If the differences are minorand far between would it be more reasonable to just make PL/pgSQL play double-duty and have a flag somewhere to indicatewhen it should be in 'PL/pgPSM' mode? Thanks. #1: INSTALL.plpgpsm starts out saying: "Installation of PL/pgSQL"I'm guessing you just missed changing it. Also in there:"For installation any PL language you need superuser's rights."should probably read:For installation of any PL languageyou need superuser rights.Or just:To install any PL language you need to be the database superuser. #2: pl_comp.c has a similar issue in its comments: pl_comp.c as the top says "Compiler part of the PL/pgSQL" .. plpgpsm_compile Make an execution tree for a PL/pgSQL function.Should read 'PL/pgPSM' there. #3: pl_comp.c uses C++ style comments for something which I'm guessing you didn't actually intend to even be in the patch://elog(ERROR,"zatim konec");in do_compile(). #4: Again in pl_comp.c there are C++ style comments, this time for variables which can probably just be removed:// PLpgPSM_nsitem *nse;// char *cp[1]; #5: In pl_exec.c, exec_stmt_open, again you have C++ style comments: // ToDo: Holdable cursors #6: In the "expected.out", for the 'fx()' function, the CONTEXT says: CONTEXT: compile of PL/pgSQL function "fx()" nearline 2Even though it says "LANGUAGE plpgpsm", which seems rather odd. #7: gram.y also has in the comments "Parser for the PL/pgSQL" .. #8: plpgpsm_compile_error_callback() passes "PL/pgSQL" to errcontext(), probably the cause of #7 and fixing it and regeneratingthe expectedoutput would probably work. #9: plerrcodes.h also has "PL/pgSQL error codes" in the comments at the top. #10: ditto for pl_exec.c "Executor for the PL/pgSQL" .. #11: more error-strings being passed with "PL/pgSQL" in it in pl_exec.c: in exec_stmt_prepare() and exec_prepare_plan(),exec_stmt_execute(): eg: cannot COPY to/from client in PL/pgSQL cannot begin/end transactions in PL/pgSQLcannot manipulate cursors directly in PL/pgSQL #12: Also in the comments for plpgpsm_estate_setup are references to PL/pgSQL. #13: pl_funcs.c also says "Misc functions for the PL/pgSQL" .. #14: plpgpsqm_dumptree outputs: Execution tree of successfully compiled PL/pgSQL function Should be updated for PL/pgPSM #15: Header comment in pl_handler.c also says PL/pgSQL #16: Function-definition comment for plpgpsqm_call_handler also says PL/pgSQL ditto for plpgpsm_validator #17: Header comment in plpgpsm.h say PL/pgSQL, other comments later as well, such as for the PLpgPSM_plugin struct #18: Also for the header comment in scan.l Enjoy, Stephen
pgsql-hackers by date: