Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20080331.123546.00485543.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>) |
Responses |
Re: pgAdmin vs. the competition
|
List | pgsql-advocacy |
> I think crossplatform development doesn't help on this issue. And > wxWidgets seems, well, less interesting (in the UI) than Qt for example. > > > Whenever PostgreSQL is busy the UI fails to > > give any clue, no icon changes to a spinning hourglass, no status bar > > filling up, not even a mindless pop-up saying "busy...". This is > > painfully obvious when doing a BACKUP or RESTORE. > > For the backup/restore stuff, I don't think pgAdmin can actually do > something better. We heavily rely on pg_dump/pg_restore. Any other UI > tool would need to do the same. > > > And even when either > > task completes, the UI/text doesn't do much to even let me know it > > worked. In fact it just re-enables the buttons again, where at first > > I'd click them and it would try to do the backup/restore again, which > > really made me believe the whole operation failed." > > > > Which lets me think he doesn't use the latest build (1.8). > > > I forward this along not to pick on pgAdmin, which is hampered in > > particular by being so cross-platform which Microsoft doesn't have to > > worry about, but to point out this is a not particularly obvious way > > PostgreSQL comparisions sometimes fail. This is not even close to the > > first time I've heard comments about how large the distance is between > > pgAdmin and the SQL Manager software in particular is, just the first > > time I could share the report. > > > > Something to chew on for those thinking about development resource > > allocation... > > > > I completely agree on this. pgAdmin is really far far far away from SQL > Manager. But they have many more developers than us, and they don't have > to handle crossdevelopment. We need to show our differences : remote > configuration, Slony support, etc. Adding pgPool, pgPool-II and > pgBouncer support would be great and is something I would like to add as > soon as possible. pgpool-II provides convenient interfaces to manage pgpool-II. "PCP commands" is a set of commands to control pgpool-II. You could, for example, get status of pgool, attach/detach DB nodes etc. See http://pgpool.projects.postgresql.org/#reference for more details. Actually pgpoolAdmin(A web based pgpool-II control GUI) uses these commands to control pgpool-II. If you prefer to use C libraries, rather than UNIX commands, you could use libpcp, an C functions control pgpool-II. PCP commands actually are made on top of libpcp. If you have questions, please let me know or you could send questions on pgpool ML (http://pgfoundry.org/mail/?group_id=1000055) -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
pgsql-advocacy by date: