Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From A. Kretschmer
Subject Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?
Date
Msg-id 20080326150208.GH27264@a-kretschmer.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?  (Marinos Yannikos <mjy@geizhals.at>)
Responses Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?  (Matthew <matthew@flymine.org>)
Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?  (Marinos Yannikos <mjy@geizhals.at>)
List pgsql-performance
am  Wed, dem 26.03.2008, um 15:18:53 +0100 mailte Marinos Yannikos folgendes:
> Hello,
>
> we have several indexes such as:
>
> create index foo1 on bla (a);
> create index foo2 on bla (b);
> create index foo3 on bla (a,b);
>
> They are all used often by frequently used queries (according to
> pg_statio_user_indexes), but we need somewhat higher INSERT/UPDATE
> performance (having tuned most other things) so we'd like to remove some.

Which version do you have? Since 8.1 pg can use a so called 'bitmap
index scan', because of this feature i guess you don't need the index
foo3. (if you have 8.1 or higher)


Andreas
--
Andreas Kretschmer
Kontakt:  Heynitz: 035242/47150,   D1: 0160/7141639 (mehr: -> Header)
GnuPG-ID:   0x3FFF606C, privat 0x7F4584DA   http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Marinos Yannikos
Date:
Subject: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?
Next
From: Matthew
Date:
Subject: Re: 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?