Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1
Date
Msg-id 20080325141519.GB9815@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1  (Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1  (Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-patches
Tree view 
I don't think
    my $int64passbyval = "(?($real64 = 1)t|f)";

works.  Perhaps

    my $int64passbyval = $real64 ? 't' : 'f';

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: actualised execute using patch
Next
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: int8/float8/time/timestamp[tz]/float4 passed by value, was Re: Fix HAVE_LONG[_LONG]_INT_64 to really define to 1