Josh,
> Then let's make it a open, no subscribe list. It wouldn't behave any
> differently than it does now but would allow us to service the
> announcement review etc...
Absolutely not. Requests made to press@ are often semi-confidential;
companies don't want to share their requests about export certification
with Google, and reporters *definitely* don't want to share their story
ideas with their collegues!
I'm really confused on why you're trying to turn a confidential,
quick-response alias into a public mailing list, when you'd just force us
to create another alias.
It sounds like -slaves is the way to go. Anyone have any other ideas?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
