Added to TODO:
* Add automated check for invalid C++ source code constructs
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-07/msg00056.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> > wild idea - we could add a bit of configure magic and a special makefile
> > target and add a buildfarm stage for that and have it automatically
> > check for these things ?
>
> I had been idly toying with the idea of making a tool to check for C++
> problems, when it occurred to me that we already have almost the right
> thing: src/tools/pginclude/pgcompinclude is a script that checks that
> each .h file in the system can be compiled without any other preceding
> inclusions except postgres.h. If run with a C++ compiler instead of C,
> seems it would accomplish the task we want.
>
> As it stands, pgcompinclude seems to lack a number of things but they're
> all fixable:
> * hard-wired compiler name and flags
> * hard-wired paths
> * should use postgres_fe.h not postgres.h for frontend-usable
> include files (would need a clearer policy for which those are)
> * possible use of unportable idioms (not sure, needs checked)
>
> Given a cleaned-up version of pgcompinclude, we could add a buildfarm
> option to invoke it using a specified compiler and options. I don't
> think we need every buildfarm member doing that but getting a
> representative sample doing so would be a Good Thing. Even without
> considering the C++ angle, this is an area that's easy to break
> and having quicker feedback would be good. The current practice of
> manually running pgcompinclude once in awhile lacks a lot, notably
> coverage of different sets of compile options (see notes at the bottom
> of src/tools/pginclude/README).
>
> Anybody feel like working on that?
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
