-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:27:46 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 02:30:19PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Either you include all contributors or you don't.
>
> That is surely a a false dichotomy. Surely we don't want to include
> everyone who ever answers a question on the mailing list, right?
Of course not. As stated previously, my gripe is explicitly the idea
that only developers can be major contributors. That is all.
I have offered several solutions to that problem, including having a
contributor_type column that would allow a major contributor to be
designated as a hacker/developer but would not give them some
preferential listing (artificial or not) over a non hacker.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH1bcfATb/zqfZUUQRAnngAJ4lA9E2UjYJv/52Vu/Ur77/PhSb2gCfUjyQ
+T6LyjnhGM+J4dQzedXxVAM=
=EDL6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
