Craig James wrote:
> This is a real problem. Countless people (including me) have
> spent significant effort rewriting applications because of this
> performance flaw in Postgres. Over and over, the response is,
> "You don't really need to do that ... change your application."
> Well, sure, it's always possible to change the application, but
> that misses the point. To most of us users, count() seems like
> it should be a trivial operation. On other relational database
> systems, it is a trivial operation.
>
> This is really a significant flaw on an otherwise excellent
> relational database system.
Have you read the TODO items related to this?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
