Bernd Helmle wrote:
> --On Montag, Februar 25, 2008 14:04:18 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> wrote:
>
> > The other issue is whether to throw error for year zero, rather than
> > silently interpreting it as 1 BC. I can't recall whether that behavior
> > was intentional at the time, but given our current rather strict
> > interpretation of date validity checking, it hardly seems like a good
> > idea now. What I suggest is that we throw error in 8.4 and beyond,
> > but not back-patch that change, so as to avoid introducing a behavioral
> > change in minor releases.
>
> That sounds reasonable. I'm still trying to find out how it was managed to
> get such a date into the database, since it seems not to be intended
> behavior by the client. Maybe it's an errorneous to_date() formatting.
Tom has applied a fix for this to CVS HEAD and back branches.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
