On Thursday 21 February 2008 11:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> Would it satisfy people if plpgsql were in postgres, but neither
> template DB, after initdb? T
No, the real-world use-case we're trying to satisfy is hosted and/or
locked-down installations where the developer doesn't have superuser access.
So putting it in "postgres" wouldn't help with that.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
