Re: CVS repository invalid revision - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christian Robottom Reis
Subject Re: CVS repository invalid revision
Date
Msg-id 20080220194332.GS3415@async.com.br
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CVS repository invalid revision  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: CVS repository invalid revision  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:13:24PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> 
> >     I'm running a conversion of PostgreSQL's CVS repository, but I'm
> > stuck on a revision that cscvs fails to parse. The hint that the error
> > gives me is:
> > 
> > Parser error: failed to parse revision data line (line: 'date: 2000/12/04 01:20:38;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;
lines:
> > ')
> > 
> > That's the literal output -- I'm not sure what the linebreak after
> > "lines:" means.
> > 
> > Can someone help me out by finding and fixing the corrupted revision?
> > I"d be most grateful.
> 
> There's no corrupted revision -- the text you see is part of a log
> message, not a real header line.  So the cscvs tool would seem to
> need to be able to cope with that.  The complete entry (this is from
> contrib/pgcrypto/md5.c, but there are several more files touched by this
> commit) is this:
> 
>     revision 1.3
>     date: 2001-01-09 13:07:13 -0300;  author: momjian;  state: Exp;  lines: +16 -16;
>     The KAME files md5.* and sha1.* have the following changelog
>     entry:
> 
>     ----------------------------
>     revision 1.2
>     date: 2000/12/04 01:20:38;  author: tgl;  state: Exp;  lines:
>     +18 -18
>     Eliminate some of the more blatant platform-dependencies ... it
>     builds here now, anyway ...
>     ----------------------------

Wow, that's very interesting. Thanks for pointing it out; now that I
have this in hand, I need to chase somebody interested in fixing a cscvs
bug <wink>
-- 
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3376 0125


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: Permanent settings
Next
From: "Gevik Babakhani"
Date:
Subject: Which MemoryContext?