On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:36:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > I don't really buy the double patching argument. Back patching becomes
> > more difficult when there has been significant code drit, but we surely
> > don't expect that much drift in the next week or two. Back patching when
> > there has been no code drift is pretty simple.
>
> Well, it's not hard, but it is tedious. Bruce and I, who are the people
> most likely to bear the brunt of such tedium, both voted to wait a week
> or so before branching. Peter did not bother to vote.
I assume this vote was taken out on -core? I don't mind -core deciding on
this, not at all, but I would appreciate it if you would post the result of
the vote on -hackers. It makes a lot of difference with an open-ended
"we'll branch sometmie later" and a "we talked about it, and we decided
we'll branch in one to two weeks unless something unusual comes up".
If you alraedy did this and I missed it in the mail-flood around fixing all
the presskits, I apologize in advance ;-)
//Magnus
