Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Josh Trutwin
Subject Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]
Date
Msg-id 20080130201415.1fc89c3f@joplin.trutwins.homeip.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?  (Tom Hart <tomhart@coopfed.org>)
Responses Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]
Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:20:58 -0500
Tom Hart <tomhart@coopfed.org> wrote:

> I have 4 years of mySQL experience (I know, I'm sorry)

Why is this something to apologize for?  I used to use MySQL for
everything and now use PostgreSQL for the majority of my DB needs.  I
certainly advocate PG now to anyone who will listen, but I don't
think it helps to portray MySQL as a POS or regret its existence.
It's a very useful tool if used correctly.  IMO, people who are able
to effectively use PG/MySQL/Oracle/XYZ appropriately are more valuable
than those that blindly use the same one for every single task.

Sorry - I just noticed this in a couple recent posts and I felt like
voicing my $0.02.

Josh

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ow Mun Heng
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?
Next
From: Ow Mun Heng
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL [WAS: postgresql book...]