Sim Zacks wrote:
> I'm a fan of unsecured languages in the database.
> Obviously they should only be used by people who understand the difference.
> I wouldn't want python locked down.
> That would prevent so many different external functions that can now
> be integrated into the database.
>
> Among other things that I currently do with plpythonu is a function
> that reads a template file, populates it with data and saves the file
> to the server. It then FTPs the file to another server. It certainly
> can all be done outside of the database, but it is so much easier (and
> less maintenance) to include it as a function.
Having the trusted language does not mean you lose the untrusted one.
We have both plperl and plperlu, for example.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
