On Monday 14 January 2008, LWATCDR <lwatcdr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Really? From what I have done in writing my own code I have found
> hashing to be faster than a btree but then when I wrote my own hashing
> it was a specific type of key.
> Anyway I put in the tree indexes and I am still getting a seq scan.
>
> Seq Scan on issuetracking (cost=0.00..12.12 rows=1 width=0)
The planner will always choose a seq scan when your table size is very
small.
