Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I figured it would make sense if pgarch.c used the same mechanism that
> postmaster.c uses to report the various variants of regular and signal
> exits.
Hmm. Getting rid of the "(PID 0)" is going to be a mess enough for
translations that I think it is worth pgarch.c having its own routine
for this. Furthermore I think the detailed archive command should be
reported in an errdetail() field, which makes it even farther off.
(Hmm, there is nearly duplicate code in pclose_check already).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
"Nunca confiaré en un traidor. Ni siquiera si el traidor lo he creado yo"
(Barón Vladimir Harkonnen)
