Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Eh.. I think you misunderstood. The Sequoia people use RAIDb to mean
> Redundant Array of Inexpensive _Databases_. A possible setup might look
> like:
You are right. I didn't understand that. Interesting.
> > I am afraid we are stuck between clarity and understand-ability here. ;-)
>
> Agreed, but that's where I think the current chapter creates confusion
> by trying to separate into "statement based replication middleware" and
> "synchronous multi-master replication". Such a separation does not
> exist, instead every combination of single vs. multi-master and
> statement based vs tuple based is possible. Examples:
>
> single-master, tuple based: Slony-I, Mammoth Replicator
> multi-master, tuple based: Postgres-R, Slony-II, maybe Bucardo (?)
> single-master, statement based: maybe pgpool or skytools can do that (?)
> multi-master, statement based: Sequoia, PgCluster
Uh, to me the issue is something like pgpool and Sequoia, where the
_master_/replication is happening _outside_ the server, vs something
like Oracle RAC where it is happening inside the server.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
