Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
Date
Msg-id 20071026220154.GF8655@crankycanuck.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:34:49AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> we only check for the case once per checkpoint and we don't create a
> segment unless there's very little space left.

Sort of a filthy hack, but what about always having an _extra_
segment around?  The bgwriter could do that, no?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: win32 threads patch vs beta2 - what to do?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] WAL archiving idle database