Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
Date
Msg-id 20071010141342.4ea75d9d@scratch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:10:17 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

>
> Looking at the discussion, I think we should just keep it
> in /contrib. The code is tightly tied to our backend transaction
> system so there is logic to have it in /contrib rather than
> pgfoundry.  I do think we should just move it into core for 8.4
> though.

In the interest of killing the problem. I agree. Everyone has had ample
opportunity for their opinions and frankly there isn't a good solution,
so let's take the one presented.

It's committed. It is in 8.3.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
--
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Timezone database changes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review