Re: CLUSTER = slower vacuum? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: CLUSTER = slower vacuum?
Date
Msg-id 20070926163241.GH8572@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to CLUSTER = slower vacuum?  ("Phoenix Kiula" <phoenix.kiula@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Phoenix Kiula escribió:
> After I clustered the primary key index of a table with about 300,000
> rows, my vacuum/analyze on that table is taking too long ... over 15
> mins when originally it was 15 seconds! Nothing else has been changed
> with this table. Is clustering not good for vacuums?

No.  Something else must be happening.  Maybe examine the output of
vacuum verbose to see where the time is going?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Poor performance with ON DELETE CASCADE
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Duplicate public schema and user tables