Re: Open issues for HOT patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Open issues for HOT patch
Date
Msg-id 200709181449.l8IEnCp02401@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Open issues for HOT patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> But then what happens when you want to update a second tuple on the same
> >> page?  None of our existing plan types release and reacquire pin if they
> >> don't have to, and I really doubt that we want to give up that
> >> optimization.
> 
> > You will prune when you lock the page and at that point unless you got
> > enough room for both tuples I doubt trying just before the second tuple
> > is going to help.
> 
> No, you're missing the point completely.  If the free space on the page
> is, say, 1.5x the average tuple size, the code *won't* prune, and then
> it will be stuck when it goes to do the second tuple update, because
> there is no chance to reconsider the prune/no-prune decision after some
> space is eaten by the first update.

My point is that if you only do this for INSERT/UPDATE, you can prune
when you have less than enough room for 3-4 tuples, and if you add the
xmin of the earliest prune xact you can prune even more aggressively.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Raw device I/O for large objects
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Traveling to Russia