Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Chris Travers wrote:
> >> Suppose as an alternative to "changing" the name, we just start
> >> promoting "Postgres" as an alternative version of PostgreSQL in the
> >> course of advocacy efforts, essentially promoting it to equal footing
> >> with PostgreSQL.
> >>
> >> I personally don't think that this would cause any substantial
> >> confusion, and would avoid the work involved in a full name change.
> >> Then, down the road, if we want to, we can revisit the decision.
> >>
> >> This would seem to give everyone what they want.
> >
> > Yea, that is another approach, making "Postgres" as a nickname more
> > visible. Can anyone see a good way to do that?
>
> Amend FAQ... that's all.
>
> Most people use it anyway ;)
Is this something we can do now, no matter the outcome of the discussion?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
