-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Chris Travers wrote:
>>>> Suppose as an alternative to "changing" the name, we just start
>>>> promoting "Postgres" as an alternative version of PostgreSQL in the
>>>> course of advocacy efforts, essentially promoting it to equal footing
>>>> with PostgreSQL.
>>>>
>>>> I personally don't think that this would cause any substantial
>>>> confusion, and would avoid the work involved in a full name change.
>>>> Then, down the road, if we want to, we can revisit the decision.
>>>>
>>>> This would seem to give everyone what they want.
>>> Yea, that is another approach, making "Postgres" as a nickname more
>>> visible. Can anyone see a good way to do that?
>> Amend FAQ... that's all.
>>
>> Most people use it anyway ;)
>
> Is this something we can do now, no matter the outcome of the discussion?
>
Why not? I have zero problem with the FAQ amendment I suggested.
Q. What is the official name of the project?
A. PostgreSQL, but we accept Postgres as an official shortened version.
I have not seen a single argument against the above and it has been
mentioned by other people (although the wording my be slightly different).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG6tIDATb/zqfZUUQRAgWFAJ9rS7URFx2qM2hgLeurgPXYQztHIACeOFHr
99RllyqfcpM+kSlIzlDgd5g=
=xhj1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
