-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>> Suppose as an alternative to "changing" the name, we just start
>> promoting "Postgres" as an alternative version of PostgreSQL in the
>> course of advocacy efforts, essentially promoting it to equal footing
>> with PostgreSQL.
>>
>> I personally don't think that this would cause any substantial
>> confusion, and would avoid the work involved in a full name change.
>> Then, down the road, if we want to, we can revisit the decision.
>>
>> This would seem to give everyone what they want.
>
> Yea, that is another approach, making "Postgres" as a nickname more
> visible. Can anyone see a good way to do that?
Amend FAQ... that's all.
Most people use it anyway ;)
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG6tD9ATb/zqfZUUQRAuI3AJ0QDongwtaR0cF/kH3HtAAH03ws7gCeNo/4
/vH15NdEfOKmTeiDXxw4mxw=
=NFbO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
