Re: Low hanging fruit in lazy-XID-assignment patch? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Low hanging fruit in lazy-XID-assignment patch?
Date
Msg-id 200709081311.37723.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Low hanging fruit in lazy-XID-assignment patch?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Low hanging fruit in lazy-XID-assignment patch?
List pgsql-hackers
Greg,

> Aren't there some things that depend on the idea that even READ COMMITTED
> transactions still have a serializable snapshot lying around for them to
> use?

No, that would be REPEATABLE READ.  That's one of the areas where we need to 
test HOT; does RR and SERIALIZABLE still work correctly with HOT?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (MaybeOFFTOPIC)
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Just-in-time Background Writer Patch+Test Results