Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >> Given that the worst-case consequence is extra index vacuum passes,
> >> which don't hurt that much when a table is small, maybe some smaller
> >> estimate like 100 TIDs per page would be enough. Or, instead of
> >> using a hard-wired constant, look at pg_class.reltuples/relpages
> >> to estimate the average tuple density ...
>
> > This sounds like a reasonable compromise.
>
> Do you want to make it happen?
I'm not having much luck really. I think the problem is that ANALYZE
stores reltuples as the number of live tuples, so if you delete a big
portion of a big table, then ANALYZE and then VACUUM, there's a huge
misestimation and extra index cleanup passes happen, which is a bad
thing.
There seems to be no way to estimate the dead space, is there? We could
go to pgstats but that seems backwards.
I was having a problem at first with estimating for small tables which
had no valid info in pg_class.reltuples, but I worked around that by
using MaxHeapTuplesPerPage. (I was experimenting with the code that
estimates average tuple width in estimate_rel_size() but then figured it
was too much work.) So this part is fine AFAICS.
I attach the patch I am playing with, and the simple test I've been
examining (on which I comment the ANALYZE on some runs, change the
conditions on the DELETE, put the CREATE INDEX before insertion instead
of after it, etc).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
