Re: Another idea for index-only scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Another idea for index-only scans
Date
Msg-id 200708151143.23960.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Another idea for index-only scans  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce,

> I have added another idea for index-only scans to the TODO list:
> >   A third idea would be for a heap scan to check if all rows are
> > visible and if so set a per-table flag which can be checked by index
> > scans. Any change to the table would have to clear the flag.  To
> > detect changes during the heap scan a counter could be set at the
> > start and checked at the end --- if it is the same, the table has not
> > been modified --- any table change would increment the counter.

Seems marginal at best.  Checking overlap between the index and the FSM/DSM 
and only check dirty pages seems more intelligent, and able to cover a 
larger number of cases.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Darcy Buskermolen
Date:
Subject: Re: XID wraparound and busy databases
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: change name of redirect_stderr?