Re: two phase commit - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: two phase commit
Date
Msg-id 20070720192645.GR30770@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to two phase commit  (Ben <bench@silentmedia.com>)
Responses Re: two phase commit  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 03:13:27PM -0700, Ben wrote:
> What corner case reduces 2pc from "guaranteed" to "very high probability"?
> Is the worry if somebody leaves transactions in a prepared state for
> weeks, only to find that deadlock issues has arrisen at final commit time?

That's not the worry, no.  But something _else_ could happen.  For
instance, recently it turned out that there was a way, using 2PC, to
lock everybody out of the database.  The only remedy to that at the
moment is to blow away all the PREPAREd transactions, which could
mean you lose something that was already committed to.

A
--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
        --Dennis Ritchie

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: OSCON Booth volunteers
Next
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Solved? Re: 8.2.4 signal 11 with large transaction