This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2007, at 19:04 , mark@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
>
> > For UUID, I
> > would value random access before sequential performance. Why would
> > anybody scan UUID through the index in "sequential" order?
>
> AIUI, to allow UUID columns to be indexed using BTREE, there needs to
> be some ordering defined. So regardless of what this ordering is,
> doesn't there need to be some order? And as a (primary?) purpose of
> UUIDs is to be (universally) unique, and the implementation of
> uniqueness constraints in PostgreSQL is based on BTREE indexes, this
> makes the necessity of ordering doubly so. Or have I missed something?
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
