Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum
Date
Msg-id 20070709011055.GD9539@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> No, it's orthogonal to whether we want a "quit" command.  (My opinion is
> not, because what the heck will we do with it in multiuser mode?  And
> there is no good way to shoehorn it into just the single-user mode, it'd
> have to be a grammar entry.)

Hmm, I was thinking that we could just add it in its own grammar, but
then I remembered that the separate grammar is for the bootstrap mode,
not standalone :-(  Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                         http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"Just treat us the way you want to be treated + some extra allowancefor ignorance."
(MichaelBrusser)
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PQescapeBytea* version for parameters