Hi,
I noticed that lazy vacuum acquires an exclusive lock at the end, to be
able to truncate the table. This is not a surprise. If it cannot
acquire the lock, it simply skips truncating the table and goes on with
life.
However, what's problematic is that if a non-zero cost delay has been
set, it will happily take naps while determining what to truncate :-(
This seems a bad idea. It also may explain why some people is seeing
autovacuum blocking other processes. It also readily explains why this
is so when there are no non-granted locks for autovacuum.
Comments? I think we should remove the sleep in the truncate phase.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
