Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 14:29 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> >
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > >> untrustworthy disk hardware, for instance. I'd much rather use names
> > >> derived from "deferred commit" or "delayed commit" or some such.
> > >
> > > Honestly, I prefer these names as well as it seems directly related versus
> > > transaction guarantee which sounds to be more like us saying, if we turn it off
> > > our transactions are bogus.
>
> That was the intention..., but name change accepted.
>
> > Hm, another possibility: "synchronous_commit = off"
>
> Ooo, I like that. Any other takers?
Yea, I like that too but I am now realizing that we are not really
deferring or delaying the "COMMIT" command but rather the recovery of
the commit. GUC as full_commit_recovery?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
