Tom Lane wrote:
> And checkpoint_rate really needs to be named checkpoint_min_rate, if
> it's going to be a minimum. However, I question whether we need it at
> all, because as the code stands, with the default BgWriterDelay you
> would have to increase checkpoint_rate to 4x its proposed default before
> writes_per_nap moves off its minimum of 1. This says to me that the
> system's tested behavior has been so insensitive to checkpoint_rate
> that we probably need not expose such a parameter at all; just hardwire
> the minimum writes_per_nap at 1.
I agree on starting with as simple a GUC as possible and expand it as
there is need in the field. 99% of people are never going to test this
value as much as you are.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
