On Tuesday 12 June 2007 12:42, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> Robert Treat wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 12 June 2007 11:02, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>>>> Robert Treat wrote:
> >>>>>> If we're going to go through this trouble, is there some reason not
> >>>>>> to put up a public trac site some place and make use of it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Seems a little overkill no? It's not like any of it would be used,
> >>>>> other than the SVN interface.
> >>>>
> >>>> I use Trac as a svn browser all the time, FWIW. I like it a lot more
> >>>> than viewcvs or whatever it is you use for pgadmin ;-) But that's just
> >>>> a matter of taste. Either one *works* fine :)
> >>>
> >>> Well, you get integrated SVN with browser which is good, but also a bug
> >>> tracking thingy if people wanted to use that... and a wiki for public
> >>> documentation... all kinds of goodies.
> >>
> >> Pretty much all of which we already have don't we?
> >
> > well yeah and it is also a bit of duplication of the features we
> > (mostly) have on pgfoundry already ...
>
> Right. What we could do is just stick up a trac (or whatever, really)
> *until* pgfoundry has svn support.
>
Did I miss the part where someone said that they'd like to not have the
website be dependent on pgfoundry?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
