Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 12 June 2007 11:02, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:53:11PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>> Robert Treat wrote:
>>>>>> If we're going to go through this trouble, is there some reason not to
>>>>>> put up a public trac site some place and make use of it?
>>>>> Seems a little overkill no? It's not like any of it would be used, other
>>>>> than the SVN interface.
>>>> I use Trac as a svn browser all the time, FWIW. I like it a lot more than
>>>> viewcvs or whatever it is you use for pgadmin ;-) But that's just a matter
>>>> of taste. Either one *works* fine :)
>>>>
>>> Well, you get integrated SVN with browser which is good, but also a bug
>>> tracking thingy if people wanted to use that... and a wiki for public
>>> documentation... all kinds of goodies.
>> Pretty much all of which we already have don't we?
>
> well yeah and it is also a bit of duplication of the features we
> (mostly) have on pgfoundry already ...
Right. What we could do is just stick up a trac (or whatever, really)
*until* pgfoundry has svn support.
//Magnus
